1) Ayden “And let me ask you a question, my friends… Were any of you able to really pick up at any point, during that completionist game play, as to where the “right wing extremism” had anything to do with it? Until, until I absolutely murdered a black person, because that’s what happened at the end is it not? At the end of that I went to one rally and I thought it was funzies and then I went to a second rally and at the second rally I beat a black man to death. That is what they are saying here, that’s it” –
No, the dead body was that of a white person. Due to the nature of propaganda: equating “hate crimes” to whites harming non whites; you automatically equivocated that you beat a black person to death in the video game EVEN THOUGH this was your second play through – but no – the dead body was a young white man. Screen cap at time index 7:42.
2) The whole simulation is a Slippery slope logical fallacy.
“You said that if we allow A to happen, then Z will eventually happen too, therefore A should not happen.
The problem with this reasoning is that it avoids engaging with the issue at hand, and instead shifts attention to extreme hypotheticals. Because no proof is presented to show that such extreme hypotheticals will in fact occur, this fallacy has the form of an appeal to emotion fallacy by leveraging fear. In effect the argument at hand is unfairly tainted by unsubstantiated conjecture.”
3) Equate valid concerns and civic activities as gateway to extremism in order to devalue those valid concerns for which there is verifiable evidence and demonize said civic activities. This is propagandic slander.
4) The 3 people beating the dissenter, looked non-white and the dead body was a white person.
5) During the monologue at the end: the dead body who’s hand is in frame: is also a white person. As seen here at time index 8:45.
6) Are they really trying to market this as anti-right/white extremism when it’s a white person who was murdered by non-whites?
7) It is of paramount importance they create a fictional event in which a hate crime against a non-white theoretically occurs, because the number of non-whites killed in hate crimes inside the UK is utterly dwarfed by comparison to the terrorist attacks carried out against whites by non-whites, particularly muslims, within the UK. yet these are “terrorist” attacks and are not counted as “hate crimes.”
8) Provide statistics on “hate crimes” but not “death tolls” in order to hide the fact that far more whites are killed by non-whites than the reverse.
9) The Hate crime, England and Wales, 2015 to 2016 DOES NOT parse the hate crimes list to show how many of said hate crimes are committed by non-whites against native whites.
10) Hate Crime statistics reported: are those which are REPORTED, not those which are tried and convicted. Anyone non-white can phone in, lie to the police and report a hate crime, no matter how fictitious: and it will be added to the registry of data presented in this simulator.
Screen Cap of Script
Taken from “the Hate crime, England and Wales, 2015 to 2016″ – page 8
“Table 1). These racially or religiously aggravated offences are by definition hate crimes. However, the hate crime collection on which the majority of the bulletin is based has a wider coverage of race and religious hate crime. This is because the police can identify other offences as hate crimes, not just those for which there is a separate specific racially or religiously aggravated offence for the police to record against. Therefore, the number of race or religious hate crimes in this bulletin will be greater than the total number of police recorded racially or religiously aggravated offences. “
11) “Hate Crimes” in the UK also include mean words on the internet, such as facebook or twitter – speech which is declared to be hate speech is recorded as a “hate crime”.
Screen Cap of Script
Taken from “the Hate crime, England and Wales, 2015 to 2016” – page 8
“This release contains figures on the number of racist incidents reported to police forces in England and Wales (excluding British Transport Police). A ‘racist incident’ is any incident, including any crime, which is perceived by the victim or any other person to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice based on a person’s race or perceived race.”
12) What the Hate crime, England and Wales, 2015 to 2016 uses as a guideline for what is and is not a “hate crime” has no legal frame work of any kind: it is entirely based on subjective opinion of the person reporting it.
Screen Cap of Script
Taken from “the Hate crime, England and Wales, 2015 to 2016” – page 8
“This release contains figures on the number of racist incidents reported to police forces in England and Wales (excluding British Transport Police). A ‘racist incident’ is any incident, including any crime, which is perceived by the victim or any other person to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice based on a person’s race or perceived race.“
Ladies, gentlemen, boys, girls and those who identify as mayonnaise or attack helicopters: this is precisely the kind of wtfery which Social justice Ideologues use in order to produce their propaganda. This is what you can expect. Nebulous terms which permit vague interpretations in order to artificially create false statistics.
This is what they do with rape, this is what they do with domestic violence, this is what they do with “Toxic Masculinity”. Here you see first hand right from the document which they cite as their source: this is what they use to create their propaganda regarding “hate crimes”.
Observing Libertarian 