That’s So Laci

Laci’s being called out by the Feminists and SJWs for wrongthink and colluding with the enemy. Being the bubble headed twit that she is: Laci didn’t understand the basic premise that SJWs consider those not with them – to be against them.

Day, Vox. SJWs Always Lie: Taking Down the Thought Police (Kindle Locations 212-215). Castalia House. Kindle Edition.

“You may not realize that you are an oppressor, but as far as the SJWs are concerned, you are. It doesn’t matter if you grew up poor, if you’re a minority, if you’re handicapped, or even if you can check off most of the victim boxes in the SJW bingo game. If you don’t unquestioningly accept the SJW Narrative, then you not only cannot be oppressed, but you have taken the side of the privileged, and in doing so, have become an oppressor yourself.”

Provided for you here as a meme to share at will: enjoy.


Examine Steve’s rant that anyone not an SJW is the worst kind of human filth alive, slandering without example and making baseless assertions. Textbook Deindividuation: he didn’t bother to single anyone out, to provide any examples of specific persons performing specific tasks which he accuses them of. They are all Q and therefore are all guilty of X, Y, Z: because that’s the nature of Q.

Michelle Maiese, research staff at the Conflict Research Consortium, from “What it Means to Dehumanize”:

“Deindividuation facilitates dehumanization as well. This is the psychological process whereby a person is seen as a member of a category or group rather than as an individual. Because people who are deindividuated seem less than fully human, they are viewed as less protected by social norms against aggression than those who are individuated. It then becomes easier to rationalize contentious moves or severe actions taken against one’s opponents.”

She goes on to say:

“Once certain groups are stigmatized as evil, morally inferior, and not fully human, the persecution of those groups becomes more psychologically acceptable. Restraints against aggression and violence begin to disappear. Not surprisingly, dehumanization increases the likelihood of violence and may cause a conflict to escalate out of control. Once a violence break over has occurred, it may seem even more acceptable for people to do things that they would have regarded as morally unthinkable before.”

Professor Emeritus Philip Zimbardo “The Lucifer Effect”, Chapter on “Dehumanization“.

“At the core of evil is the process of dehumanization by which certain other people or collectives of them, are depicted as less than human, as non comparable in humanity or personal dignity to those who do the labeling. Prejudice employs negative stereotypes in images or verbally abusive terms to demean and degrade the objects of its narrow view of superiority over these allegedly inferior persons. Discrimination involves the actions taken against those others based on the beliefs and emotions generated by prejudiced perspectives.

Dehumanization is one of the central processes in the transformation of ordinary, normal people into indifferent or even wanton perpetrators of evil. Dehumanization is like a “cortical cataract” that clouds one’s thinking and fosters the perception that other people are less than human. It makes some people come to see those others as enemies deserving of torment, torture, and even annihilation.”

I personally have always expressed a singular opinion of Laci, which hasn’t changed in light of recent events. She’s a bubble headed twit. Don’t get me wrong: nice girl, very sweet, very kind: she’s actually reminds me of a bunny rabbit. Probably the big front teeth but also her personality. She’s just this cute little infinitely lovable creature, she’s adorable. I’ve never thought her IQ was high enough to melt a Walmart ice cream sandwich.

I never, at any point, have ever stated or even thought that Laci Green was a feminist for any reason other than her own ignorance. I always believed she spoke in her videos, true to her nature, and her heart was really in it. She became a feminist due to the propaganda of feminism, you know: the whole “Feminism is about equality” shtick. This is why I’ve always thought she was a complete idiot.

To believe the propaganda of feminism: without examining the actions of feminism; denotes an easily manipulated mind. I have sincerely always thought she was dumb, not malicious. This is why I’ve never bothered attacking her or engaging her directly: she’s a care bear. Cute and sweet and innocent and naive and not very bright and it’s not necessarily her fault she fell for the slogans without examining the advocacy.

“Feminism is about equality” – Then why the single largest feminist organization in existence, the National Organization for Women, publicly state on their own website that they oppose shared parenting laws which would give men equal legal rights to that of women? (NOW’s NY branch website was taken down).

“Feminism is about equality” – Then why do feminists advocate that women not be put in prison when they commit a crime? Such as was reported on by Jezebel, The Daily Mail and the BBC?

“Feminism is about equality” – Then why did Feminists in the US make it a less legally punishable crime for a woman to rape a man than for a man to rape a woman? Also in Israel and India.

“Feminism is about equality” – Then why do Feminists advocate against False Rape accusers being tried for having falsely accused someone who was innocent of any crime? As reported by The Guardian and TIME magazine? If the accusation went all the way to trial the Accusers are guilty of filing false reports, perjury and slander.

“Feminism is about equality” – Then why do feminists protest so many men’s rights conferences, even though about male suicide when men are dying of suicide at four times the rate of women?


“Feminism is about equality” – Then why do Feminists support the Violence Against Women Act when men are the majority of assault victims, men are the majority of murder victims and in the arena of domestic violence: even Jezebel couldn’t find fault with a study which showed that women perpetrate domestic violence more than twice as often as men? Not only did they not find fault with it: they laughed at the fact that most of their fellow feminist staff members had in fact committed domestic violence in spite of not having been on the receiving end.

“Feminism is about equality” – Then why did feminists create and lobby for the Duluth Model which has been proven in several studies to be nothing more than a gender based discrimination which is used to arrest male victims of domestic violence at 3 and 5 times the rate at which women get arrested in duel arrests for domestic violence?

“Feminism is about equality” – Then why did Feminists lobby for “Yes means Yes” / “Enthusiastic Consent” to be made the standard ruling on college campuses which denies the accused any rights of an actual trial and has been shown to be so blatantly one sided that even when the co-author of the law was asked how one could prove one’s self innocent after being accused: she responded by saying “Your guess is as good as mine.”

“Feminism is about equality” – Then why does women’s forms of cancer receive 4 times as much government funding as men’s cancers even though men die of cancer more often?

“Feminism is about equality” – Then why did Feminists make Female Genital Mutilation illegal, at the federal level but not male genital mutilation illegal even though (1) an avg of 112 male children die every year in the US from routine infant circumcision and (2) it’s in violation of the 14th amendment which states “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.


With all of the equality, Laci: where’s the equality? Not seeing much equality, Laci, but I am seeing double standards in every law that feminists support. Including double standards so outright and egregious that they’re purely in violation of the 14th amendment to the constitution like the Federal Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation Act of 1995 and the Violence Against Women act.

I also find it more than a little hysterical that it would be Feminists who lobby for laws which violate the constitutional amendment which was written in order to protect blacks from the various “black codes” which former slave territories used to oppress them. Yeah, “equality”, men just need to be protected by the 14th amendment to prevent them from being exploited and denied equal rights against the Feminist “male codes.”

Again, this is why I never respected Laci or thought she or other coffee house feminists were particularly smart. To be taken in by the rhetoric of feminism “muh equality” while paying absolutely no attention to the reality of feminism: is either an act of doublethink or extreme naivety.

“If your ideology is in conflict with Reality – it is not Reality which is wrong.”

It’s not entirely her fault, she’s young, she’s impressionable, she’s not well studied. That’s the problem with coffee house feminists: they’re convinced by pretty sounding slogans and listen to what feminists say rather than paying attention to what feminists do.

Here’s the kicker: for everything I laid out above, there’s ample rationalizations to justify them. this is why I created the logical fallacy “Ad Minus Aequius”.


This is why I’m anti-feminist: not that I am a Anti-Feminist, I simply am anti-feminist.

What I advocate against: is all those who advocate for special privileges, special protections, special exemptions, preferential treatment and two tier legal systems which promote some groups to being first class citizens and other groups to being second class citizens.

Those people, persons, groups and organizations who DO advocate for special privileges, special protections, special exemptions, preferential treatment and two tier legal systems which promote some groups to being first class citizens and other groups to being second class citizens: are anti-freedom and anti-equality.

No matter how they define themselves or what they define themselves as, even if they claim to be Feminists and the dictionary definition of feminism is all about equality: the dictionary definition of “an advocate of the supremacy of a particular group, especially one determined by race or sex” is a “supremacist.


If you’re advocating for or lobbying for superior rights to be given to a group or groups OVER THAT of another group or groups: you are categorically, unabashedly and undeniably, by definition, a supremacist.

It’s a simple concept really and it goes utterly unnoticed.


Here’s the thing about Laci Green though, as I have so often remarked in this article: I fully believe her to be a kind and caring individual. It is very easy for genuinely nice people to be taken in by shysters with pleasant rhetoric. She really is a care bear in human form and she most assuredly, absolutely does NOT deserve the relentless, vitriolic, attacks which she has been receiving from the Feminists and SJWs.

It’s too bad that in her naivety and heart of hearts she couldn’t possibly foresee what kind of assault of raw, naked, seething hatred she was going to be under when she decided to cross the picket line just to talk to the other side. I’m having a conflicted intellectual response to her current situation.

On the one hand:
I know she doesn’t deserve to be so thoroughly slandered and derided.

On the other hand:
now she gets to see what most feminists are really like.

I am not particularly prone to schadenfreude, I think all aspects considered: emotionally I feel bad for her. The longer the SJW attack mobs last and the more the anti-SJW side greets her with kindness and courtesy: the more of her world view that’s going to come tumbling down around her. Things she previously believed, notions she previous treated as absolute truths, facts she thought she knew, assumptions and pretenses under which she operated.

maxresdefault (9)

Imagine the internal shock of going from “this is classic fascism fuck you white america fuck you” to all the sudden “Wow, these people are really nice to me and they make valid points which they back up with cited evidence.” That’s gotta put a whammy on your mind. “Everything I thought I knew was based on lies” – is a pretty goddamned difficult personal discovery to make.

So Laci, best of luck to you. I hope you and Chris are happy and that you find life on this side of the isle to be rewarding, truthful and evidence based.

Now gimme a hug you damn care bear.


Published by

Observing Libertarian

I am a Humanist small L libertarian Deontological Minarchist. In that order - As a result of this philosophy: I cannot in good conscience condone the actions of any group, movement or organization which seeks to oppress another individuals human rights. By education I have an Associates of Occupational Studies in Gunsmithing, and am qualified to testify in Open Court on the State's behalf as a Firearms expert. I am also an NRA Certified Firearm Instructor. I am currently in the Process of writing two books on Philosophy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s